In
front of him was a desert, or semi-desert scene done in overlapping glazes.
There were areas where the paint had been applied so sparingly that the texture
of the canvas was the chief thing you noticed, but others where the ground
disappeared while the colour maintained a paradoxical appearance of
transparency. And here and there verticals, thick strokes, almost calligraphic,
were suggestions of trees, vegetation, people even, glimpsed from afar off.
Cliche,
perhaps, but among the purple-headed mountains and the sheds and the
not-quite-Streetons, not to mention the river stones, there was something about
this picture that was not trying so hard to be representational – something of
the dreamlike, a landscape in a mirage. Dennis liked the implicit metaphor that
gave to the temporal beings their own dimension while the flat land stretched
in boundless timeless surface all about them. He looked at the catalogue.
Untitled – Deniliquin, it said, and $800. That
was pleasing. For all that this painting had reminiscences of Fred Williams, it
was a sure touch, he thought, to let the metaphor of the picture flow through
into its name. For what can we call those landscapes other than ‘untitled’ –
and yet, as long as we presume to occupy them, whether our title is of the
traditional or Torrens kind, we will put up our obsessive little signs like
‘Sandy Gully’ and ‘Ten Mile Creek’. Ghost towns too had street names once. This
artist saw more deeply than most. He checked the catalogue again; the name
meant nothing. Now he was about ready to move round the corner and begin on the
watercolours.
‘Do
you like it?’
Dennis
didn’t immediately take the words as addressed to him. But they had to be, it
seemed, for they clearly came from the only other static presence in the
immediate neighbourhood. The lateral current shuffled the crowd along the
aisles: they two alone, caught in an eddy, were slapping the seawall side by
side. He had been conscious that there was someone else pausing near the
picture, but hadn’t taken much notice.
It
was a young woman, or young enough anyway – say 25 to 35. Jeans, a white shirt
with unbuttoned cuffs, a long cardigan the way people were wearing them then: a
patterned knit in a sort of weed-green.
‘It’s
got something,’ Dennis said warily – was this perhaps the artist? ‘It’s
certainly saying “look at me”, but I don’t think it’s saying “buy me”. But I’d
sooner look at it than most of what’s here.’
‘Do
you buy things?’
‘I
have sometimes. And I think you always know when you really want to; I’ve never
bought anything I wasn’t happy with afterwards.’
‘So
you’ve got an eye – or you’re just pleased with yourself.’
‘Was
that a question?’
‘Not
really.’
This
insolence from a total stranger was a precious thing.
‘I
will tell you why I don’t want to buy it, then,’ said Dennis. ‘To me, the
coloration is just a tiny bit vulgar.’
‘Vulgar
– isn’t that a bit harsh?’
‘See
that pink there, and that shade of green up here in the sky?’
Leaning
over the barrier to make the point.
‘No
touching the works of art, please, sir,’ from a security guard.
‘What
really upsets me – no, it doesn’t upset me, it disappoints me – is that the
artist, who is obviously an intelligent person, has let him- or herself down,
and if someone comes along and buys it, it will only encourage them and they
will keep on doing it.’
‘You’re
very sure of your opinion – I’ll give you that. But you can have a few points
for “him- or her”. You’re not as completely hateful as I first thought.’
‘I
don’t find myself specially hateful. If I seemed a bit over-critical, perhaps I
was just annoyed by that guard calling me “sir”. I don’t know about you, but I
always find it irritating.’
The
Goldsworth students had been profuse with their ‘sirs’.
‘I
don’t get called “sir” much.’
‘You
know what I mean.’
‘Shall
we look at the watercolours?’
‘Why
not? Do you like licorice allsorts?’
‘Intensely.’
‘Have
some.’
The
aniseed, the musk, the banana. Flavour and colour: perfect synaesthesia. They
chewed in front of the watercolours.
No comments:
Post a Comment